Data through close

Unusual OI growth shift toward puts

Where did the balance of call-versus-put OI growth shift unusually far toward puts on Oct 16, 2026?

Rising put OI with a growth advantage over calls, and a call-minus-put growth gap at least two standard deviations toward puts relative to its own prior year. The gap has its own standardized history; subtracting the separate call and put z-scores is not this measure. Requires 200 prior comparisons, 100,000 current contracts and 1,000 contracts on each side at the prior close. This measures the OI balance, not implied-volatility skew. Data through close. Descriptive only, not a recommendation.

At a glance

5 tickers qualified. First five: TGB (Calls -5.9% · puts +31.0% · gap -36.9 pp · gap -9.01σ), IYR (Calls -20.4% · puts +40.4% · gap -60.8 pp · gap -7.74σ), XLP (Calls -4.4% · puts +24.0% · gap -28.4 pp · gap -4.30σ), GRAB (Calls -5.0% · puts +5.7% · gap -10.7 pp · gap -2.98σ), AKAM (Calls -2.2% · puts +5.3% · gap -7.5 pp · gap -2.52σ).

Unusual OI growth shift toward puts as of Oct 16, 2026 close
# Ticker Close Open interest Call / put growth and gap surprise
1 TGB 7.97 101,876 Calls -5.9% · puts +31.0% · gap -36.9 pp · gap -9.01σ
2 IYR 97.39 191,092 Calls -20.4% · puts +40.4% · gap -60.8 pp · gap -7.74σ
3 XLP 87.62 648,584 Calls -4.4% · puts +24.0% · gap -28.4 pp · gap -4.30σ
4 GRAB 2.94 2,228,242 Calls -5.0% · puts +5.7% · gap -10.7 pp · gap -2.98σ
5 AKAM 87.81 292,423 Calls -2.2% · puts +5.3% · gap -7.5 pp · gap -2.52σ

Screens describe what the data shows after the close. They are not trade recommendations; see the disclaimer and the methodology.