Data through close

CLF max pain, gamma exposure (GEX) & options open interest

As of close · rank #147 by open interest · 1,404 sessions of history since Dec 1, 2020

CLF's nearest-expiration max pain is 12.50 for 2026-10-23, its GEX flip is 8.55, net GEX is 23,283,126, its put/call open-interest ratio is 0.55. These are whole-chain derived aggregates as of Oct 16, 2026 close.

CLF max pain and GEX snapshot

End-of-day snapshot for . Nearest-expiration max pain uses the expiry shown on its card; GEX uses the whole chain. Missing values are unavailable, not zero.

Nearest-expiration max pain
12.50
+3.1% from close
Expiry: 2026-10-23
GEX flip
8.55
-29.4% from close
Net GEX
23,283,126
3,393,819 per 100k OI
Call wall
13.00
+7.3% from close
Put wall
10.00
-17.5% from close
Put/call OI
0.55
243,272 puts / 442,773 calls

Prices are in US dollars per share. Net GEX is modeled dollar-delta change per $1 underlying move. Max pain minimizes aggregate intrinsic payout for that expiration; it is not a closing-price forecast. Signed GEX uses calls positive and puts negative, a model convention rather than observed dealer inventory. The flip is a confirmed zero crossing; walls locate side-specific concentrations, not guaranteed support or resistance.

Learn how to read the max pain payout example, GEX chart, gamma flip and walls, and open interest versus trading volume.

Close
12.12
prev 12.15
Gamma max
13.33
+10.0% from close
Delta neutral
10.53
-13.1% from close
Gamma neutral
8.55
-29.4% from close
Open interest
686,045
-16.0% vs prev
Contracts listed
405
279 calls · 210 puts

Advanced options analysis

Public aggregate analysis from the dated chain, normalized where possible for comparison across tickers. Catalyst intensity measures unusual pricing and activity; it does not identify an event, predict direction, or establish that an investment is attractive.

Catalyst intensity
79.4
cross-sectional score / 100
Directional score
-10.4
mixed positioning
IV rank
100.0
within trailing 52-week range
Front IV premium
54.2 pp
front minus back volatility difference
25Δ risk reversal
7.2 pp
put IV minus call IV
IV butterfly
25.5 pp
front-window smile convexity
Volume / open interest
0.13
109,104 contracts traded
Normalized net delta
0.115
option-holder convention
Modeled dealer delta
-0.111
opposite-side scenario
Vanna / 100k OI
3,086
volatility-sensitive delta
Charm / 100k OI
-211,056
time-decay-sensitive delta
IV surface range
121.9 pp
aggregate volatility dispersion

Strongest relative signals: front IV premium 54.2 pp · smile convexity 25.5 pp · volume/OI 0.13

Download the dated aggregate analysis JSON .

CLF closed 10.0% below its gamma max of 13.33. It is 13.1% above the delta neutral price of 10.53. Total open interest is 686,045, -16.0% versus the previous session. Its options catalyst-intensity score is 79.4 out of 100, led by front IV premium 54.2 pp, smile convexity 25.5 pp, volume/OI 0.13. What gamma max means · What delta neutral means

Call versus put open interest changes

Growth compares outstanding contracts on each side. A positive growth gap favors calls; a negative gap favors puts. Standardized surprises compare each measure with its own prior history. These describe the OI balance, not IV skew or buying direction.

CLF call and put open interest changes
Measure Value
Call OI change, 1 session -78,105 contracts · -15.0%
Put OI change, 1 session -52,195 contracts · -17.7%
Call minus put OI growth, 1 session +2.7 pp
Call OI change, 5 sessions -38,259 contracts · -8.0%
Put OI change, 5 sessions -23,018 contracts · -8.6%
Call minus put OI growth, 5 sessions +0.7 pp
Daily call OI change surprise -2.55σ (252 prior changes)
Daily put OI change surprise -3.39σ (252 prior changes)
Daily call-minus-put growth surprise +0.84σ (252 prior changes)

History

2025-10 2026-10
close delta neutral gamma max
Full history since 2020: drag to pan, scroll to zoom, hover for values. Open full-screen chart

Analysis visualizations

Daily ticker aggregates through 2026-10-16. The max pain curve pools all listed expirations; individual contracts are outside the public dataset.

Aggregate IV history

Chart loads when this section is in view.

Swipe chart sideways to see the full range.

What followed prior gamma-max crosses?

Each historical path starts at 0% on the cross date and follows the close for ten subsequent trading sessions. Cohorts use the same direction as labelled and require gamma max to be within 10% of the close on both crossing sessions.

Crosses below gamma max 48 completed Day +10 paths · latest Aug 18, 2026
CLF returns after crossing below gamma max Historical close-to-close return paths from Day 0 through Day 10, with the median, middle fifty percent, and a nominal confidence interval for the median. -22.0% -11.0% 0% +11.0% +22.0% Cross on Dec 3, 2020 Cross on Dec 7, 2020 Cross on Dec 9, 2020 Cross on Dec 15, 2020 Cross on Dec 22, 2020 Cross on Dec 29, 2020 Cross on Jan 11, 2021 Cross on Mar 12, 2021 Cross on Apr 6, 2021 Cross on Apr 15, 2021 Cross on Apr 27, 2021 Cross on May 12, 2021 Cross on May 18, 2021 Cross on May 28, 2021 Cross on Jun 14, 2021 Cross on Aug 2, 2021 Cross on Aug 11, 2021 Cross on Oct 27, 2021 Cross on Jan 6, 2022 Cross on Mar 8, 2022 Cross on Mar 14, 2022 Cross on Mar 18, 2022 Cross on Mar 22, 2022 Cross on Mar 29, 2022 Cross on Apr 4, 2022 Cross on Aug 11, 2022 Cross on Aug 26, 2022 Cross on Jan 13, 2023 Cross on Mar 3, 2023 Cross on Oct 27, 2023 Cross on Nov 3, 2023 Cross on Nov 7, 2023 Cross on Nov 17, 2023 Cross on Jan 31, 2024 Cross on Apr 2, 2024 Cross on Apr 4, 2024 Cross on Apr 9, 2024 Cross on Jul 3, 2025 Cross on Jul 11, 2025 Cross on Jul 24, 2025 Cross on Jul 28, 2025 Cross on Sep 12, 2025 Cross on Oct 10, 2025 Cross on Dec 24, 2025 Cross on Jan 26, 2026 Cross on Jun 8, 2026 Cross on Aug 6, 2026 Cross on Aug 18, 2026 Day 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +10
prior crosses middle 50% of outcomes nominal ≥90% median interval median
CLF historical gamma-max cross outcomes after closing below
Horizon n Median Middle 50% Above zero Nominal ≥90% median interval Confidence floor
Day +1 48 +0.6% -0.9% to +2.1% 67% +0.2% to +1.8% +0.2%
Day +2 48 0.0% -2.8% to +2.3% 48% -1.8% to +0.7% 0.0%
Day +3 48 -1.0% -3.7% to +2.0% 38% -2.6% to +0.2% 0.0%
Day +4 48 -1.4% -4.9% to +2.4% 40% -3.4% to +0.2% 0.0%
Day +5 48 -1.4% -4.7% to +4.4% 35% -3.3% to -0.6% -0.6%
Day +6 48 -0.9% -5.5% to +7.7% 44% -3.5% to +1.6% 0.0%
Day +7 48 -0.5% -5.0% to +6.4% 42% -1.7% to +2.8% 0.0%
Day +8 48 -1.3% -5.2% to +7.9% 42% -3.2% to +1.0% 0.0%
Day +9 48 -0.3% -5.9% to +7.6% 46% -4.8% to +3.3% 0.0%
Day +10 48 -1.8% -7.1% to +8.4% 40% -4.4% to +3.2% 0.0%
Crosses above gamma max 47 completed Day +10 paths · latest Aug 17, 2026
CLF returns after crossing above gamma max Historical close-to-close return paths from Day 0 through Day 10, with the median, middle fifty percent, and a nominal confidence interval for the median. -20.0% -10.0% 0% +10.0% +20.0% Cross on Dec 4, 2020 Cross on Dec 8, 2020 Cross on Dec 10, 2020 Cross on Dec 18, 2020 Cross on Dec 23, 2020 Cross on Dec 31, 2020 Cross on Mar 11, 2021 Cross on Mar 31, 2021 Cross on Apr 14, 2021 Cross on Apr 26, 2021 Cross on May 4, 2021 Cross on May 17, 2021 Cross on May 27, 2021 Cross on Jun 9, 2021 Cross on Jul 28, 2021 Cross on Aug 10, 2021 Cross on Oct 22, 2021 Cross on Jan 5, 2022 Cross on Feb 28, 2022 Cross on Mar 10, 2022 Cross on Mar 17, 2022 Cross on Mar 21, 2022 Cross on Mar 24, 2022 Cross on Apr 1, 2022 Cross on Aug 10, 2022 Cross on Aug 25, 2022 Cross on Jan 12, 2023 Cross on Mar 2, 2023 Cross on Oct 26, 2023 Cross on Nov 2, 2023 Cross on Nov 6, 2023 Cross on Nov 15, 2023 Cross on Jan 30, 2024 Cross on Mar 27, 2024 Cross on Apr 3, 2024 Cross on Apr 5, 2024 Cross on Jul 1, 2025 Cross on Jul 10, 2025 Cross on Jul 21, 2025 Cross on Jul 25, 2025 Cross on Sep 11, 2025 Cross on Oct 8, 2025 Cross on Dec 23, 2025 Cross on Jan 23, 2026 Cross on May 26, 2026 Cross on Aug 5, 2026 Cross on Aug 17, 2026 Day 0 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +10
prior crosses middle 50% of outcomes nominal ≥90% median interval median
CLF historical gamma-max cross outcomes after closing above
Horizon n Median Middle 50% Above zero Nominal ≥90% median interval Confidence floor
Day +1 47 -0.8% -1.7% to +1.0% 40% -1.0% to +0.1% 0.0%
Day +2 47 0.0% -3.1% to +2.6% 49% -1.8% to +1.1% 0.0%
Day +3 47 -0.8% -5.0% to +2.0% 38% -3.2% to +0.2% 0.0%
Day +4 47 -1.1% -4.3% to +2.8% 36% -2.8% to -0.5% -0.5%
Day +5 47 -1.6% -4.6% to +3.2% 40% -3.1% to +0.4% 0.0%
Day +6 47 -1.9% -5.3% to +1.9% 32% -3.7% to -1.4% -1.4%
Day +7 47 -2.8% -5.7% to +7.0% 36% -4.8% to -0.3% -0.3%
Day +8 47 -1.3% -4.5% to +8.0% 38% -2.7% to +2.3% 0.0%
Day +9 47 -1.0% -7.4% to +8.6% 45% -4.8% to +1.8% 0.0%
Day +10 47 -0.9% -6.5% to +8.4% 45% -4.8% to +1.6% 0.0%

Returns are close-to-close after the labelled number of subsequent trading sessions. The confidence floor is the closest-to-zero bound of the order-statistic median interval; it is zero when that interval spans zero. Its coverage is nominally at least 90% under independent observations. Historical paths can overlap, so the interval and floor are descriptive uncertainty guides rather than formal coverage guarantees. Historical, not a forecast.

Last 252 sessions

CLF trailing historical statistics
Sessions closed above gamma max 6%
Gamma max crosses 12
Delta neutral crosses 10
Prior-year sessions closer to gamma max 48.8% of 252
Prior-year sessions closer to delta neutral 71.8% of 252
Open interest percentile (1y) 46th
Daily open interest change versus prior year -2.91σ (-130,300 contracts; 252 prior changes)
Open interest change, 5 sessions -8.2%
Open interest change, 21 sessions -7.8%
History available Dec 1, 2020 → Oct 16, 2026

Recent crosses

  1. closed above delta neutral at 11.01 vs 10.92 (+0.8%)
  2. closed below delta neutral at 11.01 vs 11.05 (-0.3%)
  3. closed below gamma max at 11.88 vs 12.30 (-3.5%)
  4. closed above gamma max at 12.31 vs 12.31 (+0.0%)
  5. closed below gamma max at 12.23 vs 12.81 (-4.8%)
  6. closed above gamma max at 12.65 vs 12.63 (+0.1%)
  7. closed below gamma max at 12.68 vs 13.48 (-6.3%)
  8. closed above gamma max at 11.98 vs 11.80 (+1.5%)
  9. closed above delta neutral at 8.45 vs 8.26 (+2.2%)
  10. closed below delta neutral at 8.11 vs 8.21 (-1.3%)

In today's screens

Neighbours by open interest

Cite or embed this snapshot

Share the dated 1600×840 image or cite this canonical page. The card contains public derived aggregates, not contract-level quotes.

Open share image

Canonical source: https://halfonadouble.com/stock/CLF

Questions people ask about CLF

What is CLF's max pain for the nearest expiration?

As of Oct 16, 2026 close, nearest-expiration max pain is 12.50 for the 2026-10-23 expiration. It is a payout-minimizing strike for one expiration. An all-expiration pooled value is a different comparison, and neither establishes where the underlying will close. Max pain definition and worked payout example.

Our 2025 max-pain study compares historical Thursday levels with Friday underlying closes and an unchanged-price baseline. Its scope and results are separate from this current ticker snapshot.

What do CLF's gamma exposure and gamma flip show?

Signed net GEX is 23,283,126 as of Oct 16, 2026 close. The confirmed GEX flip is 8.55. These aggregate model outputs use calls positive and puts negative. Their sign does not identify dealers' actual positions or predict the next move. How to interpret GEX, gamma flip and walls.

Where is CLF's gamma max today?

As of Oct 16, 2026, the gamma max for CLF is 13.33, +10.0% from the 12.12 close. Gamma max is the underlying price at which the summed gamma of every open contract is largest; how it is computed and why it matters.

Is CLF above or below its delta neutral price?

CLF closed above delta neutral: 12.12 against a delta neutral price of 10.53. The delta neutral price is where the summed delta of the whole chain is zero; the definition.

How much open interest does CLF have?

686,045 contracts of open interest across 405 listed contracts on Oct 16, 2026, -16.0% versus the previous session. What open interest measures.

Levels are recomputed after every trading day from licensed end-of-day options data; only derived aggregates are published. Methodology · Data and licence · Not investment advice.